Monday, February 7, 2011

SA Sucks Shut Down

By Mike Smith
7th of February 2010

Well, as you can see, SA Sucks have been shut down at around 04h00 UTC.

This has been the fifth time.

We are currently reviewing the way forward and what would be the best way to revive the blog. Will keep you updated.

71 comments:

  1. Can you not register your own website?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Aahh no, the bastards! Any specific reason?

    Good Luck. Norainbownation

    ReplyDelete
  3. Vive la resistance

    ReplyDelete
  4. Mike, is there any way, we can get an email if something like this happens in future. I had a hell of a time finding out what happened?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Don't give up the good fight, guys!
    You have plenty of support.

    if you need help just ask!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hey Mike

    try this for a start

    http://hosting.dod.net/

    good luck!

    ReplyDelete
  7. I reckon you guys should consider hosting with a hosting company outside South Africa and instead of using a .com extension use something like .us - that way your hosting company has to warn you first before they can shut anything down.

    ReplyDelete
  8. U know who your friends are. Shout and we will be there!

    ReplyDelete
  9. What happened was R3ndi3r decided to prove how anti-racist he was by worshipping Nelson Mandela and shutting down sites that pointed out that Nelson Mandela was a terrorist. R3ndi3r made a video calling on everyone to protest to WordPress to get South Africa Sucks shut down.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Keep pushing guys - they know you are a BIG thorn in their side - SAS with 8ooo hits per day, they better believe it!!!

    Wherever you find a new home, I believe you will attract not only the converted, but many many more who believe in freedom of speech and the outing of truth.

    Good luck guys

    ReplyDelete
  11. Hi Mike sorry to hear about the shut down ! That bastard will get his day, Keep up the good work guy's hope to see you guys up and running soon..

    Here is some help in the form of free speech hosting companies just follow the links.

    Sorry about the long list but hope it helps....

    Regards K4Clubber


    ===============================================

    1. 1st-Amendment.Net —.
    2. Computer Tyme —
    3. Free Speech Web Hosting —
    4. Project DoD —
    5. Zensurfrei
    6. Grex —
    7. CrisisHost —
    8. NearlyFreeSpeech.Net —
    9. SecureServerTech —
    10. iWeb8 —
    11. Beachcomber —
    There is a large online movement to keep the Internet free of censorship and unfair sanctions.

    The link to all these sites and explanations..

    http://whdb.com/2007/free-speech-hosting-11-web-hosts-that-wont-dump-you-at-the-first-sign-of-controversy/

    ReplyDelete
  12. Mike

    Conspiracy theory:
    What are the chances of this being a sophisticated set-up by agents outside the control of the convict hair styled steroid muscled twerp?
    He maintains he received 3 death threats from SAS correspondents
    Did he?
    Are they genuine or fictitious or plants or impostors who hi-jacked the identities of correspondents which then gave this naive fool the ammo with which to approach Wordpress to shut the blog down.
    He really could be the ultimate useful idiot

    Vasbyt!
    Aanhou wen!

    Cheers

    Laager

    ReplyDelete
  13. This guy is probably locked up in his granny’s basement somewhere, where he is plugged in to a whole network of computers and other techno gadgets.

    I can follow his every move, because I’m connected to his facebook page. I don’t know how that happened, but it happened several months ago when someone probably suggested his page to me. One tends to click the “accept” button sometimes before thinking twice. I often do this as the option is always open to block the user later, or to resign as member of the page.

    Whatever the case, I have not been paying much attention to him, and have only recently discovered that the chap has one hell-of-a inferiority complex! He is forever looking for attention, and that is the last thing I want to give him.

    With this latest incident on SAS, I think the chap noticed that the visitor-stats were high. He thus saw it as an opportunity to boost his own stats. He seems to be quite a fundi on YouTube and social networking sites, and utilises these platforms to the max. He would thus have attacked the SAS blog, whether SAS threatened him, or not - It was just a matter of time! He obviously followed through on his threats to close down the blog, simply to prove to his mates (and himself) that he can!

    I suggest that SAS get up and running asap, using blogger if necessary. It will only take a week or two to get the visitor-stats back to where they were. I’ll do my part with the marketing. I’m sure Annie Kalahari will do the same…

    Mike ek het jou mooi gewaarsku om nie die R1 teveel olie te gee nie, veral by die muis! Het julle dan nie die boodskap verstaan nie? :)

    ReplyDelete
  14. They know you are right Mike! That's why the keep shutting you down. We might be shut down,but we will not shut up! Jam

    ReplyDelete
  15. Thanks for all the support Guys and Girls.

    We will be up and running as soon as possible. This time on a secure server.

    Please bear with us trying to rebuild the blog from scratch. It might take a day or two.

    Be strong.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Hey Mike - glad to hear that. Maybe with the banner, you could add this retard's face next to Cele :) If you need help, drop me a line (You have my email)

    regards
    Macaw

    ReplyDelete
  17. It seems that the person that caused SAS to die is the one now blaming rendier. I have been a member of SAS since the beginning but it was due to your attacks and threats that he got it right to shut us down. Why couldn't you just leave it? Why did you have to act bigger than the blog? Man I love SAS but really. You let us down on this one. The obsessive posting of blogs of Rendier also didn't help. I hate that cunt but why give him so much attention, who is to say he wont ask his kaffer lovers to ban the next one and the next one?

    ReplyDelete
  18. Personal insults are one thing, but when you make direct personal threats of violence against someone then it's much easier to get your blog shut down.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Concerned CitizenFeb 7, 2011 10:38 AM

    I think everyone might be getting ahead of themselves. A blog cannot be shut down because of comments threatening people. At least not in the short-term. If that were the case, you could simply troll a blog you dislike making threatening comments as you go. A blog has to be taken down for a range of things. Simply a couple of threats should not lead to yanking a blog without calling the bloggers to order so that they can first try and sort the issue out.

    This blog was probably pulled on the premise of threats but you can be sure that wasn't the true reason. However, I agree, next time don't fall for his crap. There is a reject button for a reason, that you guys can use and not allow him the luxury of commenting on your blog.

    Congratulations to Mr shorty, he really did win the first round. I hope you guys can come back strongly and tell him where to shove it.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Hi Mike

    Sorry to hear the bad news,remember the new years resolutions lets keep up the fight and thank you and all the commentators on SAS, keep up the good work.

    Groete Boerelander

    ReplyDelete
  21. Not sure if my previous comment got through but I hope you are up and running soon...It's purely because you were becoming so popular...I reckon you guys need to go pro and register on a domain that cannot be taken down...

    ReplyDelete
  22. Concerned Citizen:

    I have to disagree here. I love SAS and trully stand behind it, however I can also see what we look like to people that don't understand our fight. They see dead kaffers on our blog and assume we hate them for no reason, they assume we are doing it for no reason. I think the best way forward is to calm down with the pictures and the words that can get us into trouble. I hate seeing us grow and then lose everything, and then start over again.

    Fuck Rendier forget about the doos, let's focus on the bigger picture, the one we started this blog for. We also don't want him to find us again cause you know he will pull the same stunt. He is by no means in the right but according to most South Africans he is. That is a fight we cannot win unfortunately.

    EYE ON THE PRIZE! FOR THE WHITE PEOPLE!

    ReplyDelete
  23. Hey MS, Knorrig,come back, do not let that moffie poepol r3ndi3r get SAS, down. You have more important things to do than let that nobody who thinks the sun shines out of his agter ent get the better of you. You guys were doing great, just ignore the little prick because the best of him ran down the crack of his momma's ass and ended up as a brown stain on the mattress.No. seriously hey guys, come back!

    Blougat

    ReplyDelete
  24. Ai I forgot about your blog now for a day Mike haha, jip really sad this shutting down thing, good thing now we know Rendier isnt a friend, had my suspisions bout him but now i know.
    I was so bedonderd when i saw the blog down, but we are commited readers, wont lose us. GL.
    RealistieseNationalis

    ReplyDelete
  25. If anyone wants to know what makes Rendier tick here is a good example. He is a fan of the "Green Skin Initiative" which is a brainwashing program to convince people that race doesn't exist or if it exists it doesn't matter and if it matters then we should all get over it.

    Since anti-racism is a code word for anti-White Rendier is actually pro-White genocide.

    Mission:

    "To infect every human being with the virus of non-racism. It can be done."

    Company Overview:

    "The Green Skin Initiative is an opportunity for all South Africans, across all race groups, cultures and ethnicities to work together, to eradicate racism and build a free, non-racial South Africa."

    "This initiative was someone's idea but it isn't owned by anyone. It embraces ideals that have been part of humanity for many years."

    "It belongs to us all and it's our collective responsibility to be infectious agents - spreading this virus as far as possible, to as many people as possible."

    "By any (legal) means necessary."

    ReplyDelete
  26. Boer Seun says:

    Get your own server at http://hetzner.de/en/

    For less than R 300,00 per month you get your own dedicated box. Their baby machines come with no setup fees. Another 9 Euros for the domain registration, build the debian box, secure everything with IPTables firewall locking all ports except 80, install some intrusion detection, encrypt the drive and you're good to go.

    Shutting you down becomes a real mission, and hetzner seems quite relaxed about the stuff that goes onto their boxes.

    ReplyDelete
  27. The disinfo already became noticeable a few days before, with trolls posing as posters twisting words and talking about shooting people.
    I'm sure a bunch of people were involved in this, and that they inquired from Wordpress exactly how to close the site (perhaps working with sympathetic people there). This is why the trolling was so violent - they knew it would all be taken down.
    It seems to have been a mixture of trolling and baiting. Reindeer certainly had a clear "aha - thank you, now I have what I was looking for" moment.
    Perhaps there was something to the Spartan method of listening to soothing music and getting rid of any anger before going into battle.
    Sad that it's gone and the mods have to go through so much effort, but it might be for the best in the long run.
    It sure went down with a bang!
    Some of the most explosive moments on the web.

    Bis bald,
    Friedrich.

    ReplyDelete
  28. SAS is a threat to the anc and their white liberal traitors. They will never silence truth. Voorwaards, SAS!! Our cause is just and opposition forges unity.

    ReplyDelete
  29. A temporary setback. SAS will always have loyal followers. Good wishes, Vicky

    ReplyDelete
  30. I’ve just noticed that this arrogant little prick has now blocked me on Facebook. I was not even part of this brawl, but now that everyone is giving him attention and mentioning his name with links to his sites – and all, which search engines pick-up quite quickly, the man is fast becoming the chief internet warrior of Africa!

    It seems that the sheeple in SA have finally found their new white god… How pathetic!

    ReplyDelete
  31. "It seems that the person that caused SAS to die is the one now blaming rendier. I have been a member of SAS since the beginning but it was due to your attacks and threats that he got it right to shut us down"

    No, it wasn't, stop lying --- if you bothered to follow the entire exchange, Rendier initially said he wanted to get SAS shut down because of the negative comments calling Mandela a 'terrorist' etc., claiming that it was 'hate speech' and that it was going to 'cause Uhuru' and that 'hate speech' should be censored. Rendier said he wanted the site shut down BEFORE any of the threats.

    Basically Rendier is acting like a child who went to 'tell on SAS' to the 'principal' because SAS did something that Rendier has been brainwashed by the 'teacher' to believe is 'naughty', 'hate speech'. This is Rendier: "Waaah, teacher, SAS is doing hate speech against Mandela and blacks, please stop it".


    "good thing now we know Rendier isnt a friend"

    Funny how Rendier used to be all against farm murders etc., but suddenly now that he is making semi-good money in 'the (big liberal) system', he starts to defend that system. Because yeah, gotta spew all the right Liberal lines or you'll be run out of town and lose that good money and good business.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Ag no now Rooster has come round looking for attention. He's like that annoying neighborhood kid when you're small, that is the social reject that nobody likes, but always hangs around because he has no friends and wants attention.

    ReplyDelete
  33. @ Rooster fuck off

    ReplyDelete
  34. Hi
    I logged onto the SAS blog yesterday morning to try post an article and found it was suspended. I was confused as I had not seen the full extent of the racket from the night before. So I wrote to Wordpress asking why the blog was suspended and requested ,in order to ensure freedom of speech, could the blog be reinstated.
    I received the following reply:

    WordPress.com greatly respects the rights of individuals to free speech, but sites that are created specifically for the purpose of publicly attacking others are not a good fit for our service. This falls under the “personal attack” category here:
    http://en.wordpress.com/types-of-blogs/

    Please note that this includes the publication of personal details with the intent to harass, as well as the incitement of hatred/violence towards in individuals or groups of individuals in both post content and comments left by readers.

    Moving forward:
    * Posting on this WordPress.com site will remain suspended.
    * There are a number of other WordPress hosts. You can find a recommended list at http://get.wp.com/hosting/ , though keep in mind many have similar rules against hateful sites.

    So I think from that it is obvious why it was suspended.

    Personally I do not think the behaviour the night before, reflects what we are trying to achieve. And as soon as any one individual becomes bigger than the blog or one issue causes so much rage, that we cannot control our reactions - then its time to take a step back and reasses.

    I only started blogging on the site recently, because I was looking for a platform to highlight the injustice and horror of what has become of my country. I was looking for like-minded individuals that were sick of just talking and wanted to unite and do something.

    And I have written about HATE before in a previous article and I will continue to speak out against those who hate simply because hate is all they have to offer the debate.

    The anger towards a certain muscle mary was justified, but if we are truly bigger than small minded liberals, then we need to prove it in our actions and behaviour.

    It is clear from the vast majority of posts on SAS, that SAS bloggers could take on any journalist in SA, because the wit and intelligence on display is deadly on its own.

    How that wit could open up eyes, make us laugh and excite the sensors - how that wit could take on liberal media and WIN! And how that wit HAS done just that!
    There is therefore no need for hate. Personally I would like to see SAS move onto its own website with better community and article forwarding options. I am even willing to fund it – but either way they can keep trying, but they cannot silence the truth!

    ReplyDelete
  35. Oh great. I see that rooster has escaped the frying pans at KFC... Hey rooster, please feel free to join REAL folks. I am off to nando's later...care to tag along :)

    ReplyDelete
  36. Anon said:

    "No, it wasn't, stop lying --- if you bothered to follow the entire exchange, Rendier initially said he wanted to get SAS shut down because of the negative comments calling Mandela a 'terrorist' etc., claiming that it was 'hate speech' and that it was going to 'cause Uhuru' and that 'hate speech' should be censored. Rendier said he wanted the site shut down BEFORE any of the threats."

    I remember that video and it was not aimed at SAS, it was aimed at people who threatened ANYONE on their death bed. Not just the old kaffer.

    So obviously SAS took offense even though we weren't even targeted.

    ReplyDelete
  37. "I remember that video and it was not aimed at SAS, it was aimed at people who threatened ANYONE on their death bed."

    No, you are wrong. We don't need to rely on your memory of the videos, as they are still there, and the timeline has been laid out clearly and with links to everything involved over here:

    http://why-we-are-white-refugees.blogspot.com/2011/02/response-from-r3ndi3r-why-i-shut-down.html

    See "Timeline of Events In R3ndi3r vs. SA Sucks". Not only was the second Rendier video not 'not aimed at SAS', as you claim, but the video description by Rendier specifically calls publicly to shut down the blog with the highly visible "(((Info on how to take that blog down at the bottom of this description)))"

    So please, get your facts straight and stop with perpetuating lies.

    ReplyDelete
  38. "I remember that video and it was not aimed at SAS, it was aimed at people who threatened ANYONE on their death bed."

    I think you're confusing the videos here .. there were TWO YouTube videos, one where he goes on about how terrible it is to criticise people who are on their deathbed. Several days later, but BEFORE anyone at SAS had threatened him, he posted a second video, this time specifically trying to get SAS shut down.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Pls post this SOMEWHERE! PLS post this on the Why we are White Refugees website, because unlike on SAS, verything is moderated!

    FUCK...I HATE CENSORSHIP!

    I read on your Facebook site that you are going to do a "vid on that 3 year baby who was shot in the head". Her name is Willemien Potgieter and she was killed 2 months ago.

    The website you closed down, SAS, raged about her death every single day from the day she was murdered, till you closed them down to satify your ego because you could'nt take them om in a rational debate.

    I hope you feel proud of yourself young man. The PC-incorrect rage blog called SAS allowed all opinions, even yours. You just allow your opinion.

    One day, when you have grown up and stepped over your ego, you'll realize that the essence of the Westtern Way of Life is to listen to ALL, respect ALL and allow them to speak in the name of Reason.

    What you have done, young man, is to burn another library. Just like the Roman Catholic Popes did to all those Galileo voices of Science.

    Yes young man, you burned 'books' just like the Nazis did, just because of your Hitler/Malema ego.

    I hope you feel proud of yourself as you stand by the burning corpse of another witch of eternal Time whom you have just burned in order to stroke your individual little ego.

    We at the SAIIR used the blog called SAS as a focus group to try to make sense of the Clash of Civilizations/Races in our country. We have been doing this type of research for 70 years now. And now you have just destroyed our best research sample on race relations because of your ego.

    I certainly hope the few 100 odd commentaries on your Facebook blog has made it all worth it.

    As a qualified Industrial Psychologist you actually should have grasped the fact that the researcher must divorce himself from the object of his study. The blog called SAS was that study object, yet you destroyed our work just because of your ego.

    You want to change hing for the better in South Africa, like all of us at the SAIIR, yet you let your ego get in the way of Science, just like the Catholic Popes did in order to protect their financial wellbeing.

    The blog called SAS was always vulnerable to witch-burning individuals like you. They were hosted by the Public on a server thatwas always doomed allow their burning in front of everybody. You, young man, used this cowardly opportunity to burn them, for the sake of your ego.

    I sincerely hope you are proud of this achievement.

    But please do take these few words of wisdom from an old man to heart.
    If you burn a library, like the SAS blog, you ignite the rage of Knowledge, just like Galileo's followers did!

    ReplyDelete
  40. Thinking: Imagine something would have happened to this Reindeer unrelated to the blog, and he became a victim of crime (as happens to people in SA everyday). Now your post is on the web stating you wanted to harm him. Who are the mainly doff cops gonna suspect? It's a potentially serious situation.

    On the other hand, when people choose to make spectacles and celebrities of themselves they also become public property in a sense.
    I mean he didn't just have a social network account and a pic on an obscure website.
    He hammered out his version of taste, and was quite the attention slut on Youtube.
    He insulted another bodybuilder for not wearing a shirt, before lifting his own shirt to reveal his garish physique. Point is, he insisted on not being anonymous - now that comes with risks.
    In light of that exhibitionism which will eventually draw fame or infamy,Wordpress could have removed some posts (about three) - it wasn't necessary to destroy (steal) the creativity of an entire community on the basis of that. How can they come with this holy, hypocritical line? I mean surely they knew of SA Sucks long before this week.
    There was humour, poetry, academia, resources and so much that is gone.
    Despite the heated ending, the 99% of the content they happily tolerated for quite long served a group of people. So they are in effect inciting against a "group of people". Yeah we might not agree on everything - but enough to make a vibrant online community.
    Maybe it's not popular speech at the moment, but one day it will be the self-evident truth!

    Wordpress sucks!
    Friedrich.

    ReplyDelete
  41. Say what you like, you're all still a bunch muppets without an inch of valid cause to explain away the intense nature of your cuntness.

    ReplyDelete
  42. I would like to add that the world doesn't want you. 5 times being closed. Take the hint and crawl into a hole where we don't haver to listen to your sack of lies, fearmongering and entirely bogus agenda. Fucking verkramptes.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Please Mike give us an update...I am suffering from withdrawl symptoms!!!
    Norainbownation

    ReplyDelete
  44. Ja, Chicken boy...

    The world does not want us in the same way the Popes did not want Galileo.

    The TRUTH of SAS flies in the face of received "wisdom" and must be SHUT DOWN by any means possible.

    I think you, rendier, and your ilk should do the world a favour and pull your heads out of your arses and have a good fucking look around you. Analyse what you see happening in this country with your MIND and not your heart.

    Everything you believe and cherish is slowly turning to shit and what sense do you make of it?

    Fuck-all!!! Typical...

    And... As for cuntness... It would seem the pot is calling the kettle black (o-o-o-p-s-!-!-!).

    ReplyDelete
  45. The whole saga regarding Rendier's closing of SAS is simply a matter of extreme jealousy on the part of the former.

    Rendier was intimidated by the success of SAS as one of the top blogs, if not the top blog, in South Africa. His intelectual dwarfism, like his physical dwarfism, raged against the superiority he clearly identified on SAS.

    His hysterical rant against an American bodybuilder's Youtube success clearly shows that this dwarfy man is suffering from a shortman Napoleon complex.

    Here you have a half-man who will do anything to steal the spotlight from others simply because deep down he knows all normally grown men laugh at his dwarfism.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Concerned CitizenFeb 9, 2011 07:52 AM

    No Rooster. YOU and those who support the politically correct religion we live under today, don't want SAS here. You are the type closing SAS down. We, the ones who made the SAS blog reach 8000 hits per day, want it here. That is why it will never stop.

    If the SAS blog was so meaningless and nobody wanted it, why on Earth do you come back and back again? Why the need to close it down? If nobody takes it seriously, there should be no reason to close it down. You are the one with the entirely bogus blog. Dude, nobody even reads your blog. NOBODY. 8000 hits a day versus maybe 1 a day on yours...that's you by the way.

    With Renaldo's little skirmish he has actually done SAS another favour. He has now forced her to seek private hosting. Thank you Renaldo and thank you Rooster. Now, since you and your buddies cannot shut down the next installment of SAS normally, by writing heart wrenching stories about how people continents away hurt your egos,what are you going to do? What other means have you got at your disposal to close her down again. NOTHING!

    You and Renaldo, chip on his shoulder shorty, couldn't handle having people with a different opinion. THAT IS WHY YOU KIND SHUT SAS DOWN. Simply put, we don't like what you say on your blog. You know what we do about that, we simply don't read it. Nobody likes what you write about, you know how we know? NOBODY READS YOUR BLOG. That is how.

    You are a pathetic creature. All you do is whine about this blog. If you hate SAS so much, why not just go join your black buddies and leave us alone? You are like a third wheel on a date! A chain around the world's neck.

    Rooster, just leave us alone.

    ReplyDelete
  47. rooster - you piece of beetle shit. I love it when you come on here. I missed you...kiss kiss.
    Have you humped your dog today or are you waiting for the video camera to be fixed?

    ReplyDelete
  48. Hey Rooster! Why don't you be a man and reveal yourself, so that we can send a little 12 year old to fuck you up?!!

    ReplyDelete
  49. @Norainbownation

    Have you had a look at
    www.why-we-are-white-refugees.blogspot.com

    ReplyDelete
  50. Rooster,

    I am a little confused. Are you a Proudly South African? if so, you endorse the TRC social contract?

    When exactly did you forgive Afrikaners/Boers/Apartheid?

    And if not; thats quite okay. But wouldn't it then be the honest thing to do, to say. I don't believe in forgiveness. I don't support the TRC, I don't want to forgive the Afrikaners/Boers/apartheid. I am not a Proudly South African. Tutu/Mandela/De Klerk give back your TRC Peace Prizes, until South africa practices sincere forgiveness, and the truth about Apartheid is finally told.

    So, did you, or did you not forgive?

    Or is your definition of 'forgiveness', the Frantz Fanon Black Liberation Theology one: 'a violent marxists revolution to abolish whiteness on the rotting corpse of the settler?'

    ReplyDelete
  51. As a moderate I believe SAS has a place and a right to be heard and read...If only to see what the "other" side has to say...Having said that, I often find the articles humerous, bold and fresh, like a slap in the face...Not to put too fine a point on it, sometimes I find myself laughing and having to grudgingly agree in some respects...Certainly, whites in SA have an automatic communal recognition of their shared plight, a kind of Jungian sub-consiousness and empathy for each other...I might add that I too have dropped the K word under certain stressful conditions! So I hope to see the blog resurrected again, with the caveat to ease off a bit on the severed heads etc, it's not doing you any favours...

    ReplyDelete
  52. Dooster, just fuck the fuck off. You never have anything interesting to add to the conversation (probably because you're brain dead), and you have never been able to argue the facts that were discussed on SAS. It must really suck to be you... having an inferiority complex and not being able to do anything about it. Go and play with your naai-maaitjie Rendier.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Mike,

    I've been reading SAS through at least 4 shutdowns, and I'll be back the minute you're online again! I hope you guys find a new home soon!

    ReplyDelete
  54. I too use the K word.....To me it is appropriate.
    European folk are able to sit and rationalise situations that they do not agree with or cannot accept, they attempt to find ways around problems that will satisfy all injvolved..Blacks, of the African, negroid type, like the Haitians, Liberians and all other groups , especially sub Saharan, just immediately became enraged and will shout down any dissent, throw things, pick up any impliment with which to maim or kill and become violent until they have their own way.
    The damage done, the lives changed, even their own injuries just do not seem to be of any consequence....hence the term Kaffir! Nigger just does not cut it!

    ReplyDelete
  55. Shame it seems Co.. uhm.. RoosterSucker is trying to to get some attention again.

    He is (along with the snotnose discussed here) just another example of the me-me-me-i'm-desperate-for-attention-and-i-wanna-get-famous-on-youtube generation. Being a slave to your ego is really a weakness. Nobody respects that.

    Andrea's link posted above is great. While I have heard of Rudolf the rednosed rendier, it was a long time back when he was picking fights with khayav and never bothered to pay attention to either of them again. I think we should forget them and just move on. They'll never silence us.

    But I must say, we should not let ourselves be baited. Keep a cool head. Friedrich made an excellent point above about listening to calming music before going into battle. I said it before, we need to guard our mouths and remain calm and collected, specifically for this reason.

    I wasn't around to see everything that went down, and Andrea's post helped a lot in that regard. I was incredibly disappointed when I wanted to take a quick look the other morning and realised that SAS disappeared. That's when I figured to come here.

    (SA White)

    ReplyDelete
  56. A few things about Rudolf Rendier. I was confused when I saw him mentioning neo-Nazis because have you seen him? Look at him. He looks like a skinhead!? All pumped up and hair shaved off. LOL.. oh, the irony.

    Furthermore, I think he's actually just a scared little mama's boy. He is so scared that anything someone else says may bring about 'uhuru', which I might add is what's been happening already and frankly, it's not going to stop even if all whites suddenly turn into a bunch of PC sheeple overnight. They'll remain lambs to the slaughter. In fact, even worse as the blacks themselves are cowards and would love any lack of resistance. That is because whites generally will kick their asses in a fair fight.

    Besides, as Andrea's post shows, little skinhead 'steroid bunny' Rudolf also made some death threats against people. But suddenly, when he gets the same he has to run around like a scawed wittle cwy-baby? No balls whatsoever. It must be all those steroids he's being using. Apparently they make you overly aggressive, but they also make your nuts shrink like raisins.

    He'll have something to cry about when the blacks go after him, which will inevitably happen.

    He was upset about Nelson Mandela being called a terrorist? Well. That's because NELSON MANDELA *WAS* A TERRORIST! Duh. Do I think Mandela was a better president than Zuma or Mbeki? Yes. But he was still a TERRORIST. I guess the 'steroid bunny' hasn't read the TRC reports about the Rivonia trial and the terrorist acts committed.

    Here are some full colour pics of what Mandela signed off:

    Nelson Mandela Bombing Record
    http://censorbugbear-reports.blogspot.com/2010/07/nelson-mandela-bombing-record.html

    White victim of ANC bomb struggles on.
    http://censorbugbear-reports.blogspot.com/2011/01/boer-victim-of-anc-bomb-battles-on.html

    http://pvj-amanzimtotibom.blogspot.com/
    http://pvj-durbanbom.blogspot.com/
    http://pvj-johannesburgbom.blogspot.com/
    http://pvj-krugersdorpbom.blogspot.com/
    http://pvj-roodepoortbom.blogspot.com/

    St. Mandela even signed off on some of them while he was in jail for... terrorism! Hellooo. But I think looking at this idiot, he was probably too young to hear his mommy say 'you can't go to Sterland for movies or ice skating because they had bombs exploding there the other day'. So little steroid bunny really is clueless.

    ... continued ...

    (SA White)

    ReplyDelete
  57. ... continued ...

    The PAC were behind the St James Church Massacre (and other attacks), which the TRC found to be GROSS HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS. See, the blacks like easy targets because however savagely they behave, they're a bunch of incompetent cowards. So they waited for white people to sit in church on a Sunday morning, then attacked them with automatic rifles and grenades. But turns out, one whitey had a teeny tiny little .38 special with him. He fired a shot which wounded one of the blacks so they ran away and forgot to set the church alight with the petrol bombs (molotov cocktails) they brought along.

    Is Malema shouting "kill the boer/farmer" not a direct threat? Yes of course it is. Duh! We all know that whites in SA are referred to 'Boere'.

    'Boer' family attacked on their smallholding by blacks shouting "Viva Malema" and "Mlungu" (which means 'white man').
    http://censorbugbear-reports.blogspot.com/2010/04/mandelas-ex-bodyguard-gert-barnard.html

    We should all probably just see little rendier for the cowardly little wimp he is. Deep down he is shitscared of being slaughtered like these people:
    http://www.truthtube.tv/play.php?vid=3855

    And Alice and Helen Lotter who were literally carved to bits (pieces of flesh came off in responding policemen's hands on scene) with broken beer bottles, tortured to death and having "kill the boer" using their own blood on the farmhouse walls. Tell them it's not 'literal'.

    That's why he's trying to compensate with YouTube and steroids. Pissy little wimp. Pity the steroids have made his balls shrivel up like that.

    He's like that TV DIY guy who told the robbers they're good little robbers for not slaughtering his family and raping his famous wife. Although in all fairness, I think that was a bit of a patronizing way of handling the robbers, but nevertheless that guy came off looking like a wimp. Just like the Reverend who said he'd pray for the attackers and then got shot anyway. Rendier, wimps are not sexy. And that really is a huge turnoff, you know.

    His behaviour is typically what you'd expect from these lefty multicultists: this article captures them so well. The right way to handle these idiots:
    http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/11/07/top-10-ways-to-school-your-leftist-friends-on-facebook/print

    (SA White)

    ReplyDelete
  58. Norainbownation, I must say I'm also getting withdrawal symptoms :( Damn. I turn my back for a couple of days and when I come back the whole blog is gone. I was really disappointed.

    I must say I agree with Anonymous (February 9, 2011 11:15 AM), except on one point. I don't care if it shows the blacks with chopped off heads of other blacks. Euphemisms are no different from political correctness. In fact I wouldn't even object to more of it, including those videos of blacks burning others alive. I once saw a video of a necklacing on South Africa-P.I.G. and it made me sick to my stomach what barbarity they are capable of. I will never watch that video again and it haunts me to this very day. But it's reality. It's the truth. And while I want the victims of such crimes to be respected, I think it's absolutely essential that the true nature of the matter comes to light.

    In fact, I would even put something in my will to provide that if they should slaughter me, impale me on a broomstick, or slit me open and hang me upside down the way they have done to other white people in SA, I would want the photos spread all over the internet on every site and every forum imaginable, not to mention sent to the UN, media and foreign embassies everywhere. I don't care what that looks like. Consider it payback for such a brutal death... my sweet, cold plate full of revenge.

    If they're embarrassed about it, they should not do it, or they should stop those who do it. That photo of the blacks posing with the other black guy's head they severed... Go ahead and post it. THE WORLD HAS TO SEE THE TRUTH. End of story.

    NASPERS hides the truth about these things. You NEVER hear the full extent of the heinous crimes these blacks commit from them. If I didn't get online after ET was hacked and bludgeoned to death in his sleep, I would never have known what the Alice & Helen Lotter slaughter-murder case was about. I never knew a thing about it until I found Adriana's reports on it.

    If you need to post photos of farm murder crime scenes on SAS to show people what the nature of the beast is, so be it. By all means. Post them everywhere, every day. Some stupid idiots out there still don't realize what's really happening.

    This whole shutting down SAS thing has only made me more determined. This just proves how much they want to cover up their true brutality. And little rendier is delusional (perhaps all those steroids affecting his brain chemistry) if he thinks that shutting up and being a good little lamb to the slaughter will stop the slaughter. The ones closest to the blacks are the ones who are more likely to get slaughtered because blacks are by nature cowardly and lazy and will go for easy targets first, especially if they are within easy reach.

    ... continued ...

    (SA White)

    ReplyDelete
  59. Hi all...

    Good news, SAS IS BACK UP! Great job guys!

    ReplyDelete
  60. Just a quick note about the 'free speech hosts' above, please just make sure as to what their orientation is.

    For example, apparently Computer Tyme says "let no anti-Bush site be left behind". Translation: regardless of what you may think of Bush, they're left-wingers. The hetzner one seems good, I've heard of them before.

    (SA White)

    ReplyDelete
  61. Tia Mysoa said...
    The youth of SA have been hijacked by the enemy! - (Video)
    February 9, 2011 1:36 PM


    Tia, that is like the scene in Dr Zhivago where the little girl tells Yuri the BS the communists feed them in schools. Yesterday it was Yuriatin, today it is South Africa and countless other countries.

    ReplyDelete
  62. What's the score again ?

    Roster 5 ? ^6 ?

    S.A.S ? Well that's a round zero.

    Hey guys. I ave thoroughly shown you that Adriana Striujt is a liar. I have shown you how names she added to her murdered list are people who are still alive. How almost none are farmers. How there are lesd than 1200 names on that list anyway. YOU HAVE GOT TO COME TO TERMS WITH THIS. TO HATE ON ME FOR EXPOSING THE TRUTH WILL NOT MAKE THE TRUTH GO AWAY.

    Admit one thing. About this I have been right. Does it make you wonder what else I have been right about ?

    Clue : everything.

    When people meet me in real life they have one reaction. They are extremely impressed with my intellect and general knowledge. Women swoon. There is no debating me about these things, off the top of my tongue I can call on 5 years intensive research. And the conclusion is simple : South Africa is better than ever. Whites have it better than anyone else. End of story. DEAL WITH IT.

    ReplyDelete
  63. And as I said in one of the first posts. If S.A.S behaves to my standards or ethics, I won't get them shut down again. Isn't that fair ?

    ReplyDelete
  64. You think you have a lot of clout don't you,? pathetic little cunt. You're an intellectual dwarf in comparison to anyone here, including and especially Ms Stuijt, a journalist of considerable years and reputation. You're a shitstain in the underpants of the white race. It is clear to anyone who cares to give you the time of day that that little brain problem you had did more than just give you a weird facial tick.

    ReplyDelete
  65. OK Roespoes, tell us exactly how you calculate the deaths of Farmers, Farm attacks, etc…

    I must be a dumb fuck, because I can’t seem to count in the correct manner.

    In your definition…what is a “Farm Murder”? Is that the same as a “Murdered Farmer”?

    Let me use an example…Let us use the recent killing of 3 year old Willemienntjie Potgieter and her parents on their farm.

    Three people died. On a Farm…but technically only Willemientjies daddy was a farmer.

    So what constitutes a “Farm Murder”, smart arse?
    What about the 92 year old Auntie Kitty Vorster attacked by six cowardly black scum a few days ago on her farm Ruspan near Hertzogville?
    http://boerenuus.blogspot.com/2011/02/kitty-vorster-92-survives-farm-attack.html

    Is she a Framer?...she was attacked on a farm and comes from a farming family her entire life…Does she count, Rooster?

    Or let us say a farmer goes into town to buy groceries and he gets shot in town…Dead farmer, but it did not happen on the farm, it happened in town…So now you have a “Murdered farmer” that is not the same as a “Farm Murder”…Does such a dead farmer count, Rooster…or is that just normal “Urban Crime”?

    What about a farmer who goes on holiday to the coast? If he gets killed in the city is that a “Farm Murder” or a “Murdered Farmer”?

    Does a farmer stop being a farmer when he goes into town, on holiday or even retire?

    Which brings me to your next argument….that of Small holdings, farms and “Perry Urban areas”…

    How big does a small holding have to be in order to be considered a farm? According to you people who stay on small holdings are not farmers. What nonsense. I have personal friends and family who make a living purely by farming everything from grapes and flowers to hydroponic tomatoes on their small holdings.

    They are as much farmers if not more, as black subsistence farmers on their little plots in the Transkei.

    I agree, Adriana’s list might not be perfect. It is far too conservative. The death count is much higher if you start examining these deaths in proper detail. Personally I calculated the death toll of white famers since 1994 to be more in the region of 12,000. How I arrive at those figures will be made known on our new blog that will be up and running in the next few days.

    As you can see…I have given you scope here to present your case, that has been shot down as all your other cases…as usual…Adriana Stuijt has presented her list…made up by meticulous recording and reporting over a long period of time….

    Now let us see your list Rooster…You have the floor. Please, dazzle us with your Farm Murder list that is better than that of Adriana’s.

    As far as I know, Adriana’s list is the most accurate and most comprehensive out there…constantly being updated and tweeked to project only the most accurate that is available. Until I see your list, I will not take your empty comments seriously.

    ReplyDelete
  66. Rooster, you are such a toss. Go and fuck your retarded mother. When you have finished with that, go and suck on your dad.

    ReplyDelete